Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Star Trek - See through - Reimagined Connie by rOEN911 Star Trek - See through - Reimagined Connie by rOEN911
Like The tittle says, See through - Reimagined Connie

Ship : Constitution Class ,Reimagined CONNIE designed by Madkoifish,you can download this ship from foundation3d.com

Hope you like it
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmarksman104:
Marksman104 Featured By Owner Apr 9, 2015  Hobbyist Artist
They really should have went with this design in the last two Star Trek movies instead of the other one

Nice work =D
Reply
:icontchalla811:
tchalla811 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2015  Hobbyist Photographer
Extraordinary!
Reply
:icontaranis69:
Taranis69 Featured By Owner Mar 18, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
excellent work. love the cutaway work
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Mar 18, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
hey cheers :)
Reply
:iconlexicon18:
LexicoN18 Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2015  Student Writer
I want this as a poster SO badly
Reply
:iconmaxine199:
Maxine199 Featured By Owner Jan 4, 2015
now THIS is what should have been used for the JJ movies.
Reply
:iconaksuperman:
AKSuperman Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2014  Professional General Artist
This is my favorite U.S.S. Enterprise redesign EVER!
Reply
:iconjricht:
jricht Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2014
WOW!

I think I've fainted. I think I've fainted. I think I've fainted. 
Love 
Reply
:icontonydennison:
TonyDennison Featured By Owner Jan 4, 2014
Very nice.
Reply
:icongravenimagez:
gravenimagez Featured By Owner Sep 27, 2013  Professional Artist
WOW!
Reply
:iconthomas150:
Thomas150 Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2013
Now this is impressive.
Reply
:iconnetcro:
Netcro Featured By Owner Jul 5, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Too Cool!!! Thank For Sharing! ;-)

:D:D:D
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Jul 5, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
np i am glad you like it :)
Reply
:iconariochiv:
AriochIV Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2013   Digital Artist
Very nice. Much better looking than the crappy new movie version.
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks
Reply
:iconsharksinspace:
SharksinSpace Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2013
This is a beautiful Constitution re-imagine.
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
cheers
Reply
:icontomanymonster:
tomanymonster Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2013
i like
Reply
:iconarmamentdawg:
ArmamentDawg Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2013
Much better looking than the abomination we saw in J. J. Abrams' reboot. Any plans to give it an angled flight deck and a second shuttlebay door, so she can simultaneously launch and recover spacecraft?
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Apr 12, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
nah its not my model or design have to stay as it is !
Reply
:iconarmamentdawg:
ArmamentDawg Featured By Owner Apr 12, 2013
A pity.
Reply
:iconpanzerbob:
PanzerBob Featured By Owner Apr 1, 2013
JUMPIN JESUS MAN YOU HAVE TALENT!!! BZ!!
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
THANKS :p
Reply
:iconblackheart-kiryu:
BlackHeart-Kiryu Featured By Owner Mar 10, 2013
From this angle the ship bares a big resemblance to the Exeter Class Cruiser from Star Trek online only the saucer looks different but i like the design.
Reply
:iconroen911:
rOEN911 Featured By Owner Mar 11, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks
Reply
:iconprincessali2013:
PrincessAli2013 Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2013
Certain irony in that JJ will be directing the new Star Wars movie as well
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2013
Before any one say's why am I called StarWdude with a picture of sexy 7 of 9 in her silver suit as my avatar? When I talking about Star Trek?

It is just a fact I like both of them so I did the avatar and the log on id name to refect both?

Now on to the new enterprise ship and for that matter the 11th new star trek film and up coming 12th film?

I totally hate the ship design as it was far too advanced for the time it was meant to be in?

Which was when a very young kirk was just starting out in starfleet and the old NCC 1701 enterprise from the old series should have been as it was then when capt pike was in charge of it before kirk was made capt of it?

Plus the 11th trek film was to a true trek fan a total load of rubbish,
J. J. Abrams is a total fool, he never bothered I found out to even watch one single tv programme of any of the trek series or any of the first 10 trek films?
Because he was so full of himself, He did not give a damn about the well known trek time line or crew or anything of the trek history, that us true long time trek fans knows about?

So worst than that he wrote and directed it as he wished to see it not how we wished to?

And he filmed it in one of the worst ways I ever seen any film done?

All it was done like was tons of Over bright light flashing in our views blinding us and mad zooming views, tons of spining the camera view around and around the crew and the ship inside and out so much so I was feeling sick from the spinnig of the images?

If he as a so called derector was even a tiny bit a true one he would know the golden rule of filming?
( which has been around as long as the film business )

To do a film the camera must act like a 3rd invisable person standing next to the action or the between the two actors slowly panning from one actor to the other as they talked in a steady way as if you was there watching the action in a normal matter so nothing was blured and you could understand what they were doing or saying fully?

Plus even in fast placed action that 3rd person view must be steady and focused on the main action so we can see it clearly and not be over welmed by blured views or image mad zooming etc.?

Plus as for the time line we all know!

He totally ruined that by having the planet vulcan destroyed with spocks mother still on it so she was killed?

What a total fool to be let loose on the great star trek world?
Gene Roddenberry must be turn in his grave?

That this fool who already totally changed every film from what fans of them loved into crap, did the same to star trek?

Now he has been given the chance to upset us true trek fans again by doing the 12th film?

He should be taken out side and shot dead for wreaking a world class sci-fi classic?
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
WARNING: English isn't my native language don't try that insult at me.
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
Not at all my friend!

I am not the nasty person some said?
I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?
I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
The main problem isn't that you had your own opinions - the problem is that you are RANTING!

Did you ever see my username ever appear on Youtube and was RANTING how bad the The Motion Picture, Wrath of Khan, Generations, Nemesis... etc etc is? NO!
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
Well, so sorry!
I was not ranting as such I just was upset the 11th film was not as well made as I hoped it could have been?

So again sorry, I like many people I talked to who had seen this film also disliked it too?

Many of them were not even trek fans just sci-fi fans who wish to see what all the fuss was about this long term series of movies based on a idea by a great man called gene roddenberry?

So please do not up set yourself?
But remember we all have likes and dislikes about what we buy or watch etc.?

I think I as a person has the right to say if I like something or not the same as anyone else?

But I will never read a persons review and then attack them online and be rude to them just because I don't like what they write!

I will instead think ok that's their personnel feeling about this subject, and except it?

But I if write a review about something I will know that there will always be someone whom disagrees with me?

And except that is the right they have in a free world!
It is not worth getting upset over it?

You have a good day, and I thank you for your views?
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
So your using the "free speech" (which is obsolete and proven CAN BE ABUSED) to defend yourself?
If you want to write how bad a film would be try that... thing... called review (which you JUST said).
I mean c'mon in that place we have to respect each other reviews but in here there were no rules of it - that is why you get "debate" in websites like Youtube.
Then again you posted your review/opinion on a wrong place, shouldn't this JJ hating goes to JJ Abram hating group?
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
Sadly about the part:
"What a total fool to be let loose on the great star trek world?
Gene Roddenberry must be turn in his grave?"

Patrick Stewart did defended you guys, and I respect that not all Trekkies are that crazy (though most of them ARE that is why even Roddenberry fear you wackos!)

Patrick Stewart objected, however, when an interviewer described Trekkies as "weird", calling it a "silly thing to say". Stewart added, "How many do you know personally? You couldn't be more wrong."

Ah... Stewart your intelligence is just as great as Picard... I was wondering are you still even Stewart since you are just as smart as Picard...
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "What a total fool to be let loose on the great star trek world?
Gene Roddenberry must be turn in his grave?"

Gene Roddenberry will feel sorry to know that MOST trekkies are this:

"...and inability to have conventional social interactions with others or distinguish between fantasy and reality."

Which is also supported by this:

"As with all stereotypes, these views were not completely inaccurate; Brent Spiner found that some could not accept that the actor who played Data was human,"

Roddenberry's reaction to you guys is this: (I'm not surprised)

"I have to limit myself to one [convention] in the East and one in the West each year. I'm not a performer and frankly those conventions scare the hell out of me. It is scary to be surrounded by a thousand people asking questions as if the events in the series actually happened.[35]"

Why am I not surprised again? RODDENBERRY FEARED TREKKIES!
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was upset the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "He totally ruined that by having the planet vulcan destroyed with spocks mother still on it so she was killed?"

ANSWER(s)
#1 (I WANT GOOD-ENDING TO EVERYTHING!) <-(IMPOSSIBLE!)
Explanation: (Do you feel sick of good ending? Even happy-go-lucky TOS series has bad ending! See: Star Trek Wrath of Khan!)

Explanation part... nuff said. I felt SICK seeing good ending all the time, it is like NOTHING BAD IS GOING TO HAPPEN. Destruction of Vulcan didn't kill ALL Vulcans either, and these other Vulcans has NOTHING TO DO with the Star Trek itself so why sympathize to them who didn't EVEN going to appear in a single scene even for!?

By saying this... I'm not saying I don't felt sad of course I do but by actually feeling so sad that you even had to include this in a ranting? I say that is OVER REACTION!
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "All it was done like was tons of Over bright light flashing in our views blinding us and mad zooming views, tons of spining the camera view around and around the crew and the ship inside and out so much so I was feeling sick from the spinnig of the images?"

ANSWER(s)
#1 (abusing special effects)
Explanation: (Preference issues... again)

While I understand some people gets REAL annoying when lights are flashing around in the screen (the scene where Enterprise is dodging ship wreck in Vulcan system?), it really has NOTHING to do with making the film bad - the main point of the film is STORYLINE (which I find quite good and "tied" together well), NOT SPECIAL EFFECTS those are just decoration that is why EA GAMES doesn't get good score on their games because it is just filled with CANDY COLORED SPECIAL EFFECTS!
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
Same reply spam? Great way to make you look like the "winner" here.
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "All it was done like was tons of Over bright light flashing in our views blinding us and mad zooming views, tons of spining the camera view around and around the crew and the ship inside and out so much so I was feeling sick from the spinnig of the images?"

ANSWER(s) <-(Sorry for double quoting I press reply too early...)
#2 (abusing special effects CONTINUE)
Explanation: (Same)

As for the mad zooming views, yes it gets annoying even for me but they didn't do it very often you know. I find the part where Nero says (THE HULL! MAGNIFY!) is quite "well-detailed" part, and they never used spinning camera view (you need to do 360 degree turn to consider it "spinning", the part where Kirk, Sulu and Pike is going to depart from the Enterprise is NOT 360 degree turning).

Using it alot...? Yes... Abusing it...? No...
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "Plus the 11th trek film was to a true trek fan a total load of rubbish,
J. J. Abrams is a total fool, he never bothered I found out to even watch one single tv programme of any of the trek series or any of the first 10 trek films?
Because he was so full of himself, He did not give a damn about the well known trek time line or crew or anything of the trek history, that us true long time trek fans knows about?"

ANSWER(s)
#1 (YOU ARE WRONG!)
Explanation: (Stereotypical Trekkies)
Source: [link]

"The Saturday Night Live segment mentioned many common stereotypes about Trekkies, including their willingness to buy any Star Trek-related merchandise, obsessive study of unimportant details of the show, and inability to have conventional social interactions with others or distinguish between fantasy and reality."

This quote above proved to us that you are not real Trekkies thus you can HATE STAR TREK (you hated the reboot don't you?). I myself is no "real" Trekkie either, the stereotypical however do get me right about the willingness to buy (or caught in attention by <insert star trek-related stuff here>) <insert star trek-related stuff here>. Also the obsessive study of unimportant details (though I'm more focused on "unimportant details" like warp speed, warp core, phasers, Federation's political system bla bla bla). But I don't have this:

"...and inability to have conventional social interactions with others or distinguish between fantasy and reality."

Well... can you see the difference between fantasy and reality?
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "So worst than that he wrote and directed it as he wished to see it not how we wished to?"

ANSWER(s)
#1 (PREFERENCE!)
Explanation: (AD HOMINEM)

While the part: "Explanation: (AD HOMINEM)" explained the question I decided to add somethings.

ADD ON: My gosh, Conan is right about Trekkies they do treat their Star Trek like religion, as if they JUST CAN'T FORGET something they don't like at all! (Trust me I do forget Voyager, DS9 and Enterprise)
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "Which was when a very young kirk was just starting out in starfleet and the old NCC 1701 enterprise from the old series should have been as it was then when capt pike was in charge of it before kirk was made capt of it?"

ANSWER(s):
#1 (TOS KIRK VS JJ KIRK!)
Explanation: (IS THE TOS KIRK MORE REALISTIC THAN THE JJ KIRK?)

They are the same Kirk.
TOS KIRK: At Starfleet Academy, Kirk became the only student to defeat the Kobayashi Maru test, garnering a commendation for original thinking by reprogramming the computer to make the "no-win scenario" winnable.

JJ KIRK : Although the movie treats specific details from Star Trek as mutable, characterizations are meant to "remain the same".

Funny, it is the same Kirk as we know, arrogant and overconfident except the JJ Kirk is more smarter than TOS Kirk since he actually (for the FIRST time I ever see Kirk grow some intelligence) figured out that destruction of U.S.S. Kelvin has something to do with the "killer" that also destroyed 47 Klingon warbirds and destruction of new Federation starships (when Enterprise reached Vulcan do you see something "weird"?).
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
:icontwinky-twinky-stars:
Twinky-Twinky-Stars Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
QUOTE: "I totally hate the ship design as it was far too advanced for the time it was meant to be in?"

ANSWER(s):
#1 (COLOR SCHEME TOS vs COLOR SCHEME JJ aka ORANGE VS WHITE)
Explanation: (WHY IS IT ORANGE IN TOS INSTEAD WHITE?)

You have to understand the fact that it when orange was a "pop culture" color that LASTED from 60s to 70s, and since we now has white color as our "flag color" why can't you perceive the film would used white color then?

#2 (TOS DESIGN VS JJ DESIGN)
Explanation: (WHY DID THEY TURN ENTERPRISE INTO HOTROD!?)

Aesthetic taste? Nuff said.
Protip: You can simply JUST imagine the ship aesthetic into TOS easily with your mind!
Reply
:iconstarwdude:
StarWdude Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013
I am not the nasty person some said?

I just thought as a long time fan of star trek who am totally in touch with the real world,

And just was unset by the bad way the 11th trek film was done?

I don't wish anybody to get the wrong idea about myself?

I am a hard working normal person who just was likes good sci-fi tv or movies like any other similer person?

I know full well it is just a sci-fi series of tv or movies made to enertain us and hopefully make some of us think about the real world issues that the shows and movies highlighted?

Like in star trek 4 movie gene roddenberry, was upset as many others where about the nasty whale hunting that was not needed and in fact was a real world problem?

So he set the movie to make the public see the fact these lovely whales were being killed just for their meat when there was no need for a mammal which had been on this planet for 10 million years longer than man to be hunted at all?

And because of the huge fan following star trek has and because of the public also being made awere of this nasty needless hunting, shortly after a world wide ban on all whaling including for so called research ( 300 whales a year by japan ) who only cared about the whales for their meat not anything else?

Today there is still a world ban on whale hunting!
Japanese ships still try to get around the ban with the english words on the side of their factory ships saying RESEARCH but the new zealand anti-whale hunting people are forever putting themselfs between the whaling ships and the whales to stop them killing the whales, and have got lots of public support and even the south american govenments have said if they find any japanese whaling ships inside their waters they will be arrested and the ships will be sunk?

So even one trek film can do what no one else could do?
Ban whaling!

So far form me being a one minded trek fan who thinks and lives out my life as if star trek is real world stuff, you are totally wrong, like millions of others I love star trek as a entertainment only, but like gene roddenberry wished the show to do it has opened all our minds to the problems in the world like no other show could and inspired inventors to make some of the idea's into a real world changing thing?
Like the mobile phone, the microwave, the internet, the super computer and so many more?

So sorry to anyone who does not share my review of the 11th trek film!
I you did like it that's fine with me!
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
January 13, 2013
Image Size
4.8 MB
Resolution
4797×2200
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
28,556 (23 today)
Favourites
493 (who?)
Comments
85
×